Commonwealth v. Ricco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that touching through the clothing may be considered “indecent contact” and rejecting a per se rule requiring “skin-to-skin” contact
• concluding that touching through the clothing may be considered “indecent contact” and rejecting a per se rule requiring “skin-to-skin” contact
• finding evidence sufficient to prove indecent assault -7- J-A09001-22 where the appellant placed the victim’s hand on the appellant’s genitals over his underwear and concluding that that there is no skin-to-skin-contact requirement in the indecent assault statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).