Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Reed

Citations

  • 971 A.2d 1216
  • 601 Pa. 257
  • 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Superior Court’s prior holding of waiver and alternative holding on the merits was law of the case
  • holding that a claim of per se ineffective assistance of counsel, if established, presumes prejudice without requiring the petitioner to demonstrate actual prejudice
  • holding that a -5- J-S03024-22 claim of per se ineffective assistance of counsel, if established, presumes prejudice without requiring the petitioner to demonstrate actual prejudice
  • concluding that “the filing of an appellate brief, deficient in some aspect or another, does not constitute a complete failure to function as a client's advocate” to establish a claim of ineffectiveness per se
  • concluding that “the filing of an appellate brief, deficient in some aspect or another, does not constitute a complete failure to function as a client’s advocate” to establish a claim of ineffectiveness per se
  • holding that the “filing of an appellate brief, deficient in some aspect or another, does not constitute a complete failure to function as a client’s advocate so as to warrant a presumption of prejudice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Greenspan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.