Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 3/25/2010

Commonwealth v. Reed

Citations

990 A.2d 1158
605 Pa. 431
2010 Pa. LEXIS 524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “the entire trial record should be evaluated and all evidence received considered, whether or not the trial court’s rulings thereon were correct.”
stating that “in the absence of a developed argument concerning the suppression ruling, no relief is available . . ..”
trial courts maintain discretionary control over the questioning of witnesses, subject to review for abuses
trial courts maintain discretionary control over the questioning of witnesses, subject to review for abuses
sufficiency determination depends on whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found every element of the crime was established beyond a reasonable doubt
sufficiency determination depends on whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found every element of the crime was established beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Randall Thomas Hetrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.