· 9/24/2003
Commonwealth v. Real Property & Improvements Commonly Known as 5444 Spruce Street
Citations
- 832 A.2d 396
- 574 Pa. 423
- 124 A.L.R. 5th 779
- 2003 Pa. LEXIS 1736
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for trial court to determine value of subject property and weigh against seriousness of offense
- remanding to determine the value of the real estate sought to be forfeited so that it could be weighed against the seriousness of the defendant’s offense
- remanding to trial court to determine value of forfeited property where value of drugs involved in defendant’s guilty plea was less than $80
- “It is settled law in Pennsylvania that a forfeiture effected pursuant to the Forfeiture Act [42 Pa.C.S. §§ 6801-6802] is a fine and thus subject to review under the Excessive Fines Clause.” (internal citation omitted)
- comparing the differing approaches across jurisdictions
- comparing the differing approaches across jurisdictions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Lamb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.