Commonwealth v. Raschid, S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• new evidence submitted in reply should not be considered 13 without affording non-moving party opportunity to respond
• “Where new evidence is presented in a reply to a motion for 13 summary judgment, the district court should not consider the new evidence without giving the 14 non-movant an opportunity to respond.” (simplified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).