Commonwealth v. Ransome, J.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff cannot survive summary judgment simply because “he believes he was treated differently … because of his race”
• holding that the district court correctly concluded that plaintiff's failure to respond to defendant's arguments result in waiver
• holding that plaintiff's offered comparator was not similarly situated because he \fail[ed] to show that [the coworker] had the same shortcomings\
• deciding that “short tempered, hostile, unfairly critical, and disrespectful” su- pervisors, who subjected the plaintiff to “excessive monitoring,” are not objectively offensive, severe, or pervasive work conditions
• holding that plaintiff’s allegations that his supervisors “were ‘short tempered,’ ‘hostile,’ unfairly critical, and disrespectful,” and that he was “subjected to excessive monitoring,” did not amount to “objectively offensive, severe, or pervasive” conditions
• determining that coworkers without similar, re- peated behavioral issues were not similarly situated for pur- poses of a Title VII claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).