Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/5/1981
Commonwealth v. Randall
Citations
- 430 A.2d 991
- 287 Pa. Super. 479
- 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2818
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- three weeks sufficiently recent to permit inference of mens rea in conviction for unauthorized use of vehicle
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hester, Shertz, Wieand
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. WhitemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-11-30· cited 98×
- Commonwealth v. HoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-11-10· cited 45×
- Burns v. BaumgardnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-08-06· cited 29×
- In the Interest of ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-11-02· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. DunlapSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-20· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. GlassmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-12-15· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. PorterMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1983-02-17· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-22· cited 7×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barnes v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-06-18· cited 793×
- Commonwealth v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-05-04· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-07-27· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. HermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-19· cited 26×
- Waldron AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-12-01· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.