Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 10/10/2018

Commonwealth v. Ramos

Citations

197 A.3d 766

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that where a sentence is intended to include restitution but is entered without a definite amount, the sentence must vacated in its entirety
stating that this Court may raise and review an illegal sentence claim sua sponte
stating that this Court may raise and review an illegal sentence claim sua sponte
remanding for resentencing rather than vacating restitution order because “restitution [w]as an integral part of the sentencing scheme.”
the legality of a sentence cannot be waived, given proper jurisdiction, and this Court can review the legality of a sentence sua sponte
court’s authority to impose restitution implicates legality of sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gantman, Kunselman, Musmanno

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.