Massachusetts Appeals Court· 9/12/1991

Commonwealth v. Ramos

Citations

577 N.E.2d 1012
31 Mass. App. Ct. 362
1991 Mass. App. LEXIS 668

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

no error where judge rejected defendant’s request for specific unanimity instruction, where prosecution alleged one event and alternative theories of guilt
“appellate decisions have consistently encouraged trial judges to respond generously to motions that they question jurors individually about possible prejudice”
“[Ajppellate decisions have consistently encouraged trial judges to respond generously to motions that they question jurors individually about possible prejudice”
an interest in the outcome of the case is a criterion for assessing credibility
\all previous extensions of the Sanders rule have been prospectively applied\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fine, Greenberg, Kass

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.