Commonwealth v. Provost

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that §§ 29A [a] and 31 taken together do not prohibit mere visual depiction of nudity
• upholding the conviction, under § 29A, as amended by St. 1988, c. 226, § 1, of a man who photographed a nude boy for private sexual gratification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).