Commonwealth v. Prince, A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a factfinder “may infer intent from circumstantial evidence” (citation omitted)
• finding no error where the instruction did not include intent to threaten a federal employee for § 115(a)(1)(B)
• “When a defendant requests and is properly denied a jury instruction because no reasonable jury could find entrapment, as in this case, it is clear that the trial record did not establish entrapment as a matter of law.”
• describing § 115 as a “strangely-worded statute”
• rejecting a claim of instructional error
• rejecting a claim of instructional error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).