Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Prater

Citations

  • 324 S.W.3d 393
  • 2010 Ky. LEXIS 256
  • 2010 WL 4146223

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not. abuse its discretion by admitting extrinsic evidence contradictory of matter defendant raised on direct examination meant to cast herself in a sympathetic light
  • “[O]ur case law continues to hold that impeachment on collateral matters ... is not allowed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Minton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.