Commonwealth v. Potts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that trial court erred for failing to recognize ARD as a prior offense for sentencing purposes
• ARD acceptance is the equivalent of a conviction only for the purpose of sentence enhancement for subsequent convictions.
• ARD acceptance is the equivalent of a conviction only for the purpose of sentence enhancement for subsequent convictions.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Tabitha
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1995-09-19· cited 144×
• Commonwealth v. Becker
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-08-10· cited 45×
• Commonwealth v. Bowers
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-06-29· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. Scheinert
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-12-11· cited 26×
• Commonwealth v. Feagley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-02-29· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Love
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-19· cited 16×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Reagan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-31· cited 41×
• Commonwealth v. Godsey
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-26· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Frost
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-05-03· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Pryor
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-27· cited 12×