Commonwealth v. Potts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing a gross abuse of discretion is not demonstrated by merely reciting facts of record that would support a result contrary to the court's actual decision.”
• recognizing a gross abuse of discretion is not demonstrated by merely reciting facts of record that would support a result contrary to the court's actual decision.”
• certifying court’s consideration of fact that juvenile was implicated in a homicide at the time of the certification hearing, as well as other factors, was not an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Hughes
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-12-21· cited 218×
• Commonwealth v. Shull
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-09-13· cited 117×
• Commonwealth v. Soltis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-12-23· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Holzlein
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-12-30· cited 9×
• In the Interest of Crespo
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-07-29· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Burley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-05-20· cited 3×
• Commonwealth v. Beasley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-11-30

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-12-27· cited 66×
• Commonwealth v. Bell
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-19· cited 48×
• Commonwealth v. Moss
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-05-20· cited 43×
• Commonwealth v. Leatherbury
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-01-25· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Cessna
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-02-01· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. Madden
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-26· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-12-07· cited 10×