Commonwealth v. Posavek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant did not intend to perform his promises where he had attempted to use a business organization to evade responsibility
• stating that the defendant filed a motion for a new trial based on after discovered evidence, alleging that a juror violated the duty to refrain from discussing the case with others
• defendant’s intentional inaccessibility upon a customer’s inquiry about a home improvement agreement and construction was a circumstance to be considered by a jury regarding requisite intent to deceive for conviction of theft by deception
• evidence, other than fact that promises were not performed, was sufficient to prove theft by deception; while defendant was cooperative before victim paid him, victim had great difficulty contacting defendant after paying him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).