Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Pittman

Citations

  • 76 Mass. App. Ct. 905
  • 923 N.E.2d 1083
  • 2010 Mass. App. LEXIS 413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • testifying expert identified spent casing introduced in evidence “as the one returned to the local police after ballistics testing was performed on the gun”
  • court finds error in admitting ballistics certificate without testimony to be “harmless beyond a reasonable doubt” in light of “overwhelming evidence independent of the ballistics certificate that the gun in question was operable”
  • where officer identified spent casing as one returned to police after ballistics testing was performed on gun — even though he did not personally check weapon — his testimony regarding ballistics analysis allowed jury to infer that gun fired when tested

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.