Commonwealth v. Pittman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accused’s presence at scene and acquaintance with shoplifting suspect, held, insufficient to show agreement
• accused's presence at scene and acquaintance with shoplifting suspect, held, insufficient to show agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Commonwealth v. Lynch
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-05· cited 25×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Roux
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-01-29· cited 124×
• Commonwealth v. Waters
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-03· cited 32×
• Commonwealth v. Esposito
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-09-22· cited 28×
• Commonwealth v. Ridgely
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-22· cited 26×