Commonwealth v. Pirela

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• issues of credibility are left to trier of fact who is free to accept all, part, or none of witnesses' testimony
• use of “X” proper particularly since trial judge was fact finder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Murray
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-09-13· cited 63×
• Commonwealth v. Zugay
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-19· cited 63×
• Commonwealth v. Bishop
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-11-24· cited 57×
• Commonwealth v. Hlatky
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-05-25· cited 48×
• Commonwealth v. Fox
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-01-14· cited 41×
• Commonwealth v. Russell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-09-29· cited 36×
• Commonwealth v. Zewe
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-02· cited 32×
• Commonwealth v. Campbell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-06-03· cited 27×
• Commonwealth v. Wright
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-11-20· cited 26×
• Commonwealth v. Sopota
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-03-08· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Ritter
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-10-28· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. McGlone
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-09-08· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Brady
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-11-15· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-06-17· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Wells
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-03-15· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Sherrell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-04-30· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Shotwell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-09-01· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Bourgeon
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-12-20· cited 10×