Commonwealth v. Phillips

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Since the flight to avoid apprehension statute is plain on its face, and the Commonwealth did not prove that Appellant had been charged with a crime when he fled, insufficient evidence existed to find him guilty of the aforementioned offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• In the Interest of: P.S., a Minor, Appeal of: P.S.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-03-17· cited 78×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Watley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-11-25· cited 414×
• United States of America, Appellant/cross No. 88-3268 v. Alan Frank, A/K/A A. Roy, Appellee/cross No. 88-3220
  Third Circuit· 1989-01-04· cited 165×
• Commonwealth v. Fortune
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-05-31· cited 102×
• Commonwealth v. Steffy
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-01-25· cited 27×
• Commonwealth v. Graham
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-12-21· cited 24×
• In the Interest of C.S.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-03-05· cited 16×