Commonwealth v. Phillips

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although our review of the issues raised on appeal has been hampered by the defects in appellant’s brief, we are not precluded from reaching the merits of appellant’s claim as the lower court has addressed each contention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Sattazahn
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-07-30· cited 53×
• Commonwealth v. Scarfo
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-17· cited 45×
• Commonwealth v. Solomon
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-07-22· cited 38×
• Commonwealth v. Banks
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-05-22· cited 10×
• Toscano v. A. Bassaner Ltd.
  Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 2013-08-18
• Commonwealth v. Jones
  Monroe County Court of Common Pleas· 1992-08-27