Commonwealth v. Petty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• attorney-client communication in busy clerk’s office is not protected by privilege because client could have no reasonable expectation of privacy when he chose to converse there
• attorney-client communication in busy clerk’s office is not protected by privilege because client could have no reasonable expectation of privacy when he chose to converse there

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• National Economic Research Associates, Inc. v. Evans
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2006-08-03· cited 1×
• Transocean Capital, Inc. v. Fortin
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2006-10-20

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Montanez
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-05-30· cited 161×
• Commonwealth v. Tracy
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1989-06-19· cited 18×
• Hoy v. Morris
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1859-09-15· cited 4×