Commonwealth v. Perry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘ ‘expandable baton’ ’’ not ‘‘ ‘black- jack’ ’’ for purpose of dangerous weapon statute
• \a general tenet of statutory construction is that the statutory expression of one thing is an implied exclusion of other things omitted from the statute\ [quotation and citation omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Rosado
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2013-08-30· cited 15×
• Lazlo L. v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2019-05-16· cited 9×
• Massachusetts Care Self-Insurance Group, Inc. v. Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency Fund
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-11-12· cited 5×
• State v. DeCiccio
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-12-23
• Hull v. Ferrera
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2026-03-05

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Miller
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1986-09-08· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Ronald R.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-12-13· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Blavackas
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1981-04-28· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-07-23· cited 2×