Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1/12/2015
Commonwealth v. Perrin
Citations
- 108 A.3d 50
- 2015 Pa. Super. 4
- 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5
- 2015 WL 138963
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing Castro and remanding for a hearing because the appellant named proposed witnesses
- after-discovered evidence discovered during direct appeal process must be raised promptly during direct appeal process and should include request for remand to trial judge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shogan, Wecht, Strassburger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. PaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-06-17· cited 225×
- Commonwealth v. CastroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-06-16· cited 184×
- Commonwealth v. MontalvoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-28· cited 168×
- Commonwealth v. RiveraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-12-03· cited 80×
- Commonwealth v. PerrinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-01-03· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. CastroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-10-05· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.