Commonwealth v. Perrin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that double jeopardy did not preclude fourth jury trial
• “It is generally correct that a defendant need not raise a double jeopardy issue in post-trial motions and that they may properly be raised prior to a retrial.”
• 8'/4 hours for murder, robbery, and conspiracy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-01-20· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Marconi
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-22· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Hunter
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-02-14· cited 3×
• Bach v. Geisinger Medical Center
  Montour County Court of Common Pleas· 1985-01-11