Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Perez

Citations

  • 103 A.3d 344
  • 2014 Pa. Super. 247
  • 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3947
  • 2014 WL 5462604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding ineffectiveness claim concerning absence of no-adverse-inference instruction failed due to lack of prejudice where multiple eyewitnesses identified Perez and forensic evidence corroborated their testimony
  • explaining that morphine is the active ingredient in heroin
  • failure to adequately identify an issue in a concise manner in a Rule 1925(b) statement impedes the trial court’s preparation of its legal analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Shogan, Ott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.