Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/28/1977
Commonwealth v. Perea
Citations
- 381 A.2d 494
- 252 Pa. Super. 272
- 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2884
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where the voir dire question covers matters within the province of the court to address in its instructions to the jury, then it is properly rejected
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Voort, Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Spaeth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. HammSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-17· cited 41×
- Commonwealth v. BrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-06-13· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. RitterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-10-28· cited 19×
- Com. v. Walker, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-10-13· cited 12×
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1985-06-07· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. RichmondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-08· cited 6×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. AgieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-17· cited 185×
- Commonwealth v. McGrewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-11-17· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. BibaloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-11-09· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. JamesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-10-09· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. SushinskieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1913-11-07· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-01-07· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1913-11-07· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.