Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Pena

Citations

  • 575 N.E.2d 774
  • 31 Mass. App. Ct. 201
  • 1991 Mass. App. LEXIS 576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in reviewing denial of motion for new trial, evidentiary hearing ordered so Commonwealth would have opportunity to produce evidence to justify warrantless search, where counsel’s failure to file motion to suppress not reasonable
  • “failure of counsel to litigate a viable claim of illegal search and seizure is a denial of the defendant’s Federal and State constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Fine, Porada

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.