Commonwealth v. Pemberton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, under typical Tort Claims Act analysis, that amounts received as Medicare benefits would reduce a claimant’s recovery under the Swine Flu Act
• noting in an FTCA case where Medicare covered the plaintiff’s in- jury that “[t]here may be cases in which the government is entitled to a partial set-off ….”
• noting in an FTCA case where Medicare covered the plaintiff’s in- jury that “[t]here may be cases in which the government is entitled to a partial set-off ….”
• noting in an FTCA case where Medicare covered the plaintiff’s in- jury that “[t]here may be cases in which the government is entitled to a partial set-off ….”
• Part A Medicare benefits were not a collateral source only because the plaintiff did not contribute to the Social Security fund
• Part A Medicare benefits were not a collateral source only because the plaintiff did not contribute to the Social Security fund

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).