Commonwealth v. Peeples

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a relevance objection was insufficient to preserve an unfair prejudice objection where the relevance objection contained no phrases or arguments that could reasonably have been expected to focus the court's attention on concerns about unfair prejudice
• “In order to properly preserve an objection to evidence admitted at trial, a timely and specific objection must appear in the trial court 42 record.”
• \Merger has not eliminated the difference between law and equity with regard to jury trials.\
• “[T]here is no valid basis in law or equity why an arbitration clause should not be enforced against a subrogee.”
• “In order to properly preserve an objection to evidence admitted at trial, a timely and specific objection must appear in the trial court record.”
• “In order to properly preserve an objection to evidence admitted at trial, a timely and specific objection must appear in the trial court record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).