Commonwealth v. Payne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that although a party may use a writing to refresh its witness’s recollection, that party has no right to treat the writing as evidence, by reading it, showing it, or handing it to the factfinder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Genteel
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-10-11· cited 44×
• Commonwealth v. Lamb
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-01-14· cited 41×
• Commonwealth v. Montgomery
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-12-26· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Scott
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-05· cited 1×
• Kimble, R. v. Laser Spine Institute, LLC
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-09-30· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Turner
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-06-06· cited 61×
• Commonwealth v. Delfino
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1918-01-07· cited 48×
• Commonwealth v. Knudsen
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-06-28· cited 31×
• Commonwealth v. White
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-04-20· cited 29×