Commonwealth v. Pass

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding challenge to court’s imposition of sentence of six (6) to twenty-three (23) months imprisonment and sentence of one (1) year probation running consecutive, did not present substantial question
• recognizing “long-standing precedent” that “affords the sentencing court discretion to impose its sentence concurrently or consecutively to other sentences . . . already imposed”
• stating that a challenge to the trial court’s discretion to impose a consecutive sentence does not raise a substantial question
• stating that a challenge to the trial court’s discretion to impose a consecutive sentence does not raise a substantial question
• stating that a challenge to the trial court’s discretion to impose a consecutive sentence does not raise a substantial question
• holding challenge to court's imposition of sentence of six [] to [23] months['] imprisonment and sentence of one [] year probation running consecutive, did not present substantial question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).