Commonwealth v. Parr's

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when considering whether stray remarks are probative of discrimination, courts consider the relationship of the speaker to the employee, the purpose and content of the statement, and the temporal proximity of the statement to the adverse employment action
• considering the conduct of plaintiff and the proposed comparators and finding their situations not comparable
• “An inference of discrimination may arise if similarly situated employees of a different race received more lenient treatment than that afforded plaintiff.”
• “An inference of discrimination may arise if similarly situated employees of a different race received more lenient treatment than that afforded plaintiff.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).