Commonwealth v. Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a trial court acting as a finder of fact may draw reasonable inferences from the evidence
• noting that; \The determination of whether identification testimony violates a defendant's due process rights involves a two-step process.\
• noting that, “The determination' of whether identification testimony violates a defendant’s due process rights involves a two-step process.”
• stating “[t]he determination of whether identification testimony violates a defendant’s due process rights involves a two-step process.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Johnny Hatcher, Jr. v. Shelby County Election Commission the City of Memphis, a Corporation and A.C. Wharton, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2011-04-28

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Neil v. Biggers
  Supreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
• Simmons v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
• Rakas v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
• Rawlings v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 2,425×
• Willie Arthur Thigpen v. Duane Cory
  Sixth Circuit· 1986-12-19· cited 102×
• National Soffit & Escutcheons, Incorporated v. Superior Systems, Incorporated
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-10-11· cited 99×
• Dillingham v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1999-07-13· cited 57×
• Martin v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2000-02-24· cited 36×
• Ordway v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2011-09-22· cited 26×
• Cantrell v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 25×
• King v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2004-05-20· cited 23×
• Savage v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1995-10-19· cited 16×
• Burton v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1969-05-21· cited 10×
• Foltz v. Thigpen
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-08· cited 8×
• United States v. Jones
  S.D. New York· 1986-06-03· cited 5×
• State v. Wilkins
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1988-01-06· cited 3×