Commonwealth v. Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellant cannot complain that the Commonwealth is estopped on due process grounds from prosecuting him with independent evidence when his immunized testimony was not used against him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-09-07· cited 40×
• Goods v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-12-27· cited 20×
• Jacobs v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-10-22· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Swinehart
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-05-24· cited 1×
• Commonwealth v. Cosby, Jr., W., Aplt.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-06-30

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Morrissey v. Brewer
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
• Gagnon v. Scarpelli
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
• Kastigar v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 2,510×
• Riccobene Appeal
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-07-13· cited 58×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-21· cited 32×
• Commonwealth v. Kaye
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-02-27· cited 3×