Skip to main content
· 6/10/2011

Commonwealth v. Parenteau

Citations

  • 460 Mass. 1
  • 948 N.E.2d 883
  • 2011 Mass. LEXIS 440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the certificate at issue was testimonial because it proved “an essential element of the charged crime”
  • a judge must carefully examine each record at issue to “determine” whether the record is testimonial
  • where document is subsequently created by agency to establish fact at trial, it is testimonial and violates confrontation clause even though document is based on preexisting agency records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ireland, Spina, Cordy, Botsford, Gants, Duffly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.