Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Palmer

Citations

  • 464 Mass. 773
  • 985 N.E.2d 832
  • 2013 WL 1339111
  • 2013 Mass. LEXIS 63

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is a cardinal principle of statutory interpretation that ‘[n]one of the words of a statute is to be regarded as superfluous’ ” (quoting Commonwealth v. Woods Hole, Martha’s Vineyard & Nantucket S.S.Auih, 352 Mass. 617, 618 (1967)
  • statutes should be read as whole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Botsford, Duffly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.