Commonwealth v. Paige

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[M]aps used for various municipal purposes, such as assessors’ maps, may be used to establish the boundaries of school property for purposes of [G. L. c. 94C,] § 32J,” the statute punishing drug offenses within 1,000 feet of a school
• contiguous, unused, and undeveloped school land was school property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Leib
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2022-06-16· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Whitlock
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2009-05-28· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Cintron
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-08-29· cited 1×
• Commonwealth v. Pierson
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-02-16

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Zone Book, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-04-13· cited 111×
• United States v. Antonio Sival Campbell, United States of America v. Isaac Gadson, United States of America v. Clarence Edward Haynes
  Fourth Circuit· 1991-06-05· cited 61×
• Commonwealth v. Roucoulet
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-11-06· cited 60×
• State v. Ivory
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-07-11· cited 55×
• Commonwealth v. Alvarez
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-07-24· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. Spano
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1993-01-15· cited 44×
• Commonwealth v. Tata
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1989-11-08· cited 22×
• State v. Baez
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-01-22· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Davie
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1998-12-15· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Klusman
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1999-03-25· cited 8×
• Stamps v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-08· cited 6×
• State v. Peterson
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1992-09-23· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-02-08· cited 5×