Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Pagan

Citations

  • 864 A.2d 1231
  • 2004 Pa. Super. 483
  • 2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4937

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a petitioner may not seek relief by way of a writ of coram nobis “merely because the PCRA refuses to remedy a petitioner’s grievance”
  • explaining that other remedies do “not become available merely because the PCRA [court] refuses to remedy a petitioner’s grievance; rather, we look at the claims a petitioner is raising”
  • stating that “[u]nder the plain words of the [PCRA], if the underlying substantive claim is one that could potentially be remedied under the PCRA, that claim is exclusive to the PCRA.” (emphasis in original)
  • explaining “if the underlying substantive claim is one that could potentially be remedied under the PCRA, that claim is exclusive to the PCRA.”
  • explaining “if the underlying substantive claim is one that could potentially be remedied under the PCRA, that claim is exclusive to the PCRA.”
  • explaining “if the underlying substantive claim is one that could potentially be remedied under the PCRA, that claim is exclusive to the PCRA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green, Lally, Olszewski, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.