Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Padilla-Vargas

Citations

  • 204 A.3d 971

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring that an appellant preserve her challenge to the discretionary aspects of sentencing at the sentencing hearing or in a post-sentence motion
  • requiring that challenges to the discretionary aspects of sentencing be preserved at sentencing or in a post- sentence motion
  • noting that that “[o]bjections to the discretionary aspects of a sentence are generally waived if they are not raised at the sentencing hearing or in a motion to modify the sentence imposed”
  • finding appellate failed to preserve challenge to discretionary aspects of sentence by failing to preserve issued in a post-sentence motion.
  • “Objections to the discretionary aspects of a sentence are generally waived if they are not raised at the sentencing hearing or in a motion to modify the sentence imposed.”
  • an appellant cannot cure the waiver of a sentencing claim by failing to raise it at sentencing or in a post-sentence motion by including the challenge in his Rule 1925(b) statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stabile, Dubow, Nichols

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.