Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/17/2007

Commonwealth v. Owens

Citations

929 A.2d 1187
2007 Pa. Super. 213
2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that, although handguns involved in the shooting were never recovered, handgun parts and ammunition were “relevant as tending to prove that the defendants had weapons similar to the one used in the perpetration of the crime”
reiterating principle from Commonwealth v. Broaster, 863 A.2d 58 8, 592 (Pa .. Super. 2004
error to admit rifle scopes, a scope mount, and rifle ammunition recovered from defendant’s home where it was not relevant to the crimes in question; the defendant threatened the victims with a shotgun, and his co-defendant fired at them with handguns which were never found

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, Klein, Colville

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.