Commonwealth v. Ostolaza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• resentencing was not required where a defendant received the same sentence as was imposed at the original trial notwithstanding the fact that the more serious robbery conviction was reversed on appeal, and the conviction for the lesser included offense of theft remained

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Commonwealth v. Black
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-09-22· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Riggins
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-08-17· cited 471×
• Commonwealth v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-01-29· cited 246×
• Commonwealth v. Ostolaza
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-06-29· cited 23×