Commonwealth v. O'Neill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that a motorist’s involvement in an accident and the odor of alcohol on his breath “would allow a reasonable person in the position of the police officer” to conclude that reasonable grounds existed
• determining that a motorist’s involvement in an accident and the odor of alcohol on his breath “would allow a reasonable person in the position of the police officer” to conclude that reasonable grounds existed
• “our reading of the provisions of Section 1547(b) gives no indication that the legislature ever intended such a requirement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-11-24· cited 8×
• Cole v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-11-02· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Cavanaugh
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-04-15· cited 6×
• Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing v. Martino
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-17

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Dreisbach
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-08-27· cited 78×
• Sickman v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-19· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. Krishak
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-08-22· cited 16×