Commonwealth v. Odrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “statements made by [Odrick] after he was handcuffed were not a result of custodial interrogation but instead were ‘blurt outs’ and thus were admissible despite the fact Miranda warnings were not given”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).