Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. O'Brien

Citations

  • 514 A.2d 618
  • 356 Pa. Super. 294
  • 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 12037

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding “[t]he words ‘not less than’ used in [Section 9718] unambiguously connote a minimum term of imprisonment”
  • “The words ‘not less than’ used in the statute unambiguously connote a minimum term of imprisonment. It strains all notions of common sense to suggest that ‘not less than’ can reasonably be interpreted as meaning ‘maximum.’”
  • “The words ‘not less than’ used in the statute unambiguously connote a minimum term of imprisonment. It strains all notions of common sense to suggest that ‘not less than’ can reasonably be interpreted as meaning ‘maximum’”
  • “The words ‘not less than’ used in the statute unambiguously connote a minimum term of imprisonment. It strains all notions of common sense to suggest that ‘not less than’ can reasonably be interpreted as meaning ‘maximum’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Wickersham, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.