Commonwealth v. O'Brien

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the size of a premises or community does not dictate whether it is “‘public’ for purposes of the disorderly conduct statute’”
• stating that, like in Whritenour, the private road was “‘a place to which the public or a substantial group,’ namely the surrounding community’s residents and their invitees, ha[d] access”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Garland
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-03-01· cited 263×
• Commonwealth v. Fedorek
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-04-30· cited 74×
• Commonwealth v. Coleman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-01· cited 13×
• Com. v. Cooper, H.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-04-22

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. DiStefano
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-08-16· cited 268×
• Commonwealth v. Whritenour
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-05-01· cited 17×