Commonwealth v. Nine Hundred & Ninety-Two Dollars

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that there may be occasions in which deliberate misrepresentations to a magistrate, even if not essential to a finding of probable cause, would call for suppression under art. 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights
• noting that there maybe occasions in which deliberate misrepresentations to a magistrate, even if not essential to a finding of probable cause, would call for suppression under art. 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights
• noting that the exclusionaiy rule is fully applicable in forfeiture proceedings
• applying civil discovery rules because proceeding a “civil suit in equity”
• no hearing required where defendant made no showing that affiant had any reason to doubt truth of statements given to him
• no hearing required where defendant made no showing that affiant had any reason to doubt truth of statements given to him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).