Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Newman

Citations

  • 84 A.3d 1072
  • 2014 Pa. Super. 2
  • 2014 WL 31327
  • 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the plain view doctrine requires, inter alia, an officer to view the evidence from a lawful vantage point
  • finding no probable cause to arrest individual who received “an ordinary grocery bag” from person suspected of distributing drugs
  • “The [suppression] court erroneously relied on the Newman [C]ourt’s plain view analysis[,]” which, the Commonwealth asserts, was obiter dicta and, therefore, not precedential, “where consent was not an issue in” Newman

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Fitzgerald, Panella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.