Skip to main content
· 2/11/2009

Commonwealth v. Nava

Citations

  • 966 A.2d 630
  • 2009 Pa. Super. 28
  • 2009 Pa. Super. LEXIS 35
  • 2009 WL 331368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a sentence is illegal where no statutory authority for the sentence exists
  • stating that “[a] case is ‘moot’ when a determination is sought on a matter which, when rendered, cannot have any practical effect on the existing controversy.”
  • stating that a case is “moot when a determination is sought on a matter which, when rendered, cannot have any practical effect on the existing controversy.”
  • stating that an “issue before a court is moot if in ruling upon the issue the court cannot enter an order that has any legal force or effect”
  • explaining that “[a]n issue before a court is moot if in ruling upon the issue the court cannot enter an order that has any legal force or effect”
  • stating that an issue is moot if any ruling can have no practical effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melvin, Cleland, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.