Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Nassar

Citations

  • 406 N.E.2d 1286
  • 380 Mass. 908
  • 1980 Mass. LEXIS 1196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that dual purposes of G.L.c. 123 are to protect patient and public
  • referring to involuntary detention of those suffering from mental illness as involving “massive curtailment of liberty”
  • applying statutory standard to commitment proceeding under G. L. c. 123, § 16[b\\
  • civil commitment under G. L. c. 123 need not involve commitment to State institution with total loss of liberty
  • least restrictive alternative determination under G. L. c. 123 \is for the judge in the first instance\ and \in [the judge's] discretion\
  • involuntary commitment under mental health code must be based on proof beyond reasonable doubt standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Quirico, Braucher, Kaplan, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.