Commonwealth v. Nahavandian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• quashing an untimely appeal and stating that jurisdiction is vested in the Superior Court only upon the filing of a timely notice of appeal
• “Jurisdiction is vested in the Superior Court upon the filing of a timely notice of appeal.”
• “Jurisdiction is vested in the Superior Court upon the filing of a timely notice of appeal.”
• “Jurisdiction is vested in the Superior Court upon the filing of a timely notice of appeal.”
• “This Court has held that the date of imposition of sentence in open court, and not the date on which the sentence is docketed, is the reference point for computing the time for filing post-sentence motions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Trinidad
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-04-21· cited 239×
• Commonwealth v. Crawford
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-04-08· cited 122×
• Commonwealth v. Duffy
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-07-15· cited 22×
• In the Interest of R.Y.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-29· cited 11×
• In Re Ry
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-29
• Com. v. Hill, K.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-11-14

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Yarris
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-05-21· cited 284×
• Commonwealth v. Green
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-11-16· cited 174×
• Commonwealth v. Miller
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-07-07· cited 108×
• Commonwealth v. Ludwig
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-05-19· cited 94×

Other cases named Commonwealth v. Nahavandian

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Commonwealth v. Nahavandian
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-04-23· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Nahavandian
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-01-04
• Commonwealth v. Nahavandian
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-01-04